netdev - RE: [PATCH] udev: create empty regular files to represent net interfaces

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:09:10 -0500
From:	<Jordan_Hargrave@...l.com>
To:	<dannf@...com>, <Matt_Domsch@...l.com>
Cc:	<kay.sievers@...y.org>, <linux-hotplug@...r.kernel.org>,
	<Narendra_K@...l.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<Charles_Rose@...l.com>, <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] udev: create empty regular files to represent net interfaces

I was thinking, if we're not planning on use the chardev/kernel route.  There already exists an ifindex file in /sys/class/net/XXX/ifindex.
Should udev/helper be creating links to this, or is it better to keep everything under the /dev/ tree?
Using this method would require the patch to udev to handle renaming events.

--jordan hargrave
Dell Enterprise Linux Engineering

-----Original Message-----
From: dann frazier [mailto:dannf@...com]
Sent: Wed 10/28/2009 10:09
To: Domsch, Matt
Cc: Kay Sievers; linux-hotplug@...r.kernel.org; K, Narendra; netdev@...r.kernel.org; Hargrave, Jordan; Rose, Charles; Ben Hutchings
Subject: Re: [PATCH] udev: create empty regular files to represent net interfaces

On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 08:03:08AM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 09:23:57AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
[...]
> > That all sounds very much like something which will hit us back some
> > day. I'm not sure, if udev should publish such dead text files in
> > /dev, it does not seem to fit the usual APIs/assumptions where /sys
> > and /dev match, and libudev provides access to both. It all sounds
> > more like a database for a possible netdevname library, which does not
> > need to be public in /dev, right?
> 
> Right, it doesn't need to be in /dev.  We could have udev rules that
> simply call yet another program to maintain that database, in yet
> another way.

Or have udev maintain them in a private directory (e.g.,
/var/lib/udev/netalias). Personally, I like the approach of having
udev manage them as files - its an abstraction our users already get,
and they don't have to learn two mechanisms when aliasing disks and
nics (SYMLINK ftw). Plus there's obviously a lot of code reuse to be
had (most of my patch was moving code into a common section).

If we want to hide the file implementation - we could invent another
udev construct that basically aliases SYMLINK (e.g. NETALIAS) that
works iff the device is a netdevice. That would let us switch out
implementations in the future, but would obviously be much more
invasive.

-- 
dann frazier

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html