lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 08 Nov 2009 00:34:25 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	socketcan@...tkopp.net
Cc:	eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: should not use __dev_get_by_index() without locks

From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:04:16 +0100

> Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> [PATCH] can: should not use __dev_get_by_index() without locks
>> 
>> bcm_proc_getifname() is called with RTNL and dev_base_lock
>> not held. It calls __dev_get_by_index() without locks, and
>> this is illegal (might crash)
>> 
>> Close the race by holding dev_base_lock and copying dev->name
>> in the protected section.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
 ...
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@...tkopp.net>

Applied, thanks everyone.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ