netdev - Re: [PATCH resent] Documentation: rw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:08:08 -0500
From:	William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@...il.com>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
CC:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Developers <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resent] Documentation: rw_lock lessons learned

Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> I would rather see the text in Documentation/spinlocks give an explaination
> as to why reader/writer locks are normally not desirable. 
> 
> The whole document needs work to make it a developer document, rather than
> a historical mail thread..  A good document says what should be done today,
> and does not have old junk or ask the reader to overly new context
> on old information.
> 
You wish me to merge our patches?

Or this is a second patch in a proposed series?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html