netdev - Question about IP_TOS and DSCP handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:55:49 -0700
From:	Philip Prindeville <philipp@...fish-solutions.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Question about IP_TOS and DSCP handling

I'm looking at net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c circa line 512 (this is in 2.6.27.38):

        case IP_TOS:    /* This sets both TOS and Precedence */
                if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_STREAM) {
                        val &= ~3;
                        val |= inet->tos & 3;
                }
                if (inet->tos != val) {
                        inet->tos = val;
                        sk->sk_priority = rt_tos2priority(val);
                        sk_dst_reset(sk);
                }
                break;

and it doesn't look like the kernel handles DSCP marking. Is that
correct?  (Also, not clear why SOCK_STREAM gets handled differently...)

Looking at rt_tos2priority(), which uses IPTOS_TOS(x), it doesn't look
like that would be the correct thing to do.

Also, include/linux/ip.h no longer meshes with
/usr/include/netinet/in.h. Please see:

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10789

I'm trying to add DSCP marking to Thunderbird, Firefox, Apache, and a
few other applications but I wanted to make sure that my test platforms
would handle it correctly first.

Thanks,

-Philip

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html