netdev - Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH v7 5/7 RFC] TCPCT part 1e: implement socket option TCP_COOKIE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:49:44 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	william.allen.simpson@...il.com
Cc:	joe@...ches.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH v7 5/7 RFC] TCPCT part 1e: implement
 socket option TCP_COOKIE_TRANSACTIONS

From: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:16:03 -0500

> Therefore, it's plain as can be that this is just more jumping through
> arbitrary and capricious hoops that others are not required to follow.

Others, like Eric and Ilpo, don't have to jump through these hoops
because when they submit patches their code doesn't have coding
style issues like your's does.

Trust me, it's not about you, and you're not being picked out
specifically.  These things would be enforced upon anyone.  The only
unique aspect about you is that you seem to respond to these
requirements in the most sour manner possible rather than pleasantly
complying and thus getting your changes added to the tree.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html