netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] add the driver for Analog Devices Blackfin on-chip CAN controllers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 09 Dec 2009 20:50:47 +0100
From:	Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
To:	Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
CC:	socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de,
	uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	"H.J. Oertel" <oe@...t.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] add the driver for Analog Devices Blackfin on-chip
 CAN	controllers

Barry Song wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com> wrote:
>> Barry Song wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: H.J. Oertel <oe@...t.de>
>>> ---
>>>       -v2: cleanup according to Wolfgang Grandegger's feedback
>>>       1.delete some unnecessary debug print
>>>       2.delete ndo_tx_timeout entry as it is not needed in can
>>>       3.use alloc_can_skb, alloc_can_err_skb instead of netdev_alloc_skb
>>>       4.add timeout while polling can status
>>>       5.rename BFIN_CAN_READ/WRITE_MSG to bfin_can_read/write_data
>>>       6.use kernel BIT instead of bit shift
>>>       7.use void __iomem * for CAN memory base memory instead of u32
>>>       8.delete "dev->last_rx = jiffies" since it is not needed now
>>>       9.delete redundant "echo_skb" member in bfin can private data
>>>       10.follow can convention to use "_" instead of "-" for file names
>> Did you consider using structs instead of these ugly and cumbersome
>> macro functions? This was my major criticisms with your previous version
>> of the patch.
> Wolfgang,
> I considered using the structures to describe registers, and I
> completely agree with you about the advantages of structures. And I am
> sure I will move to structures after some time and send a patch for
> it. But for the moment, it is not too urgent, so I only fixed all your
> other comments. Anyway, if you insist on using structures in just this
> patch, I can fix and send the -v3 patch after finishing it.

Well, "it's not too urgent" is not a real argument for me, sorry. As
Marc pointed out, the current "#define's" are not acceptable, anyway.
Please invest time in moving to structs right a way.

Thanks,

Wolfgang.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html