netdev - Re: [Uclinux-dist-devel] [PATCH v3] add the driver for Analog Devices Blackfin on-chip CAN controllers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:48:52 +0100
From:	Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
To:	Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
CC:	"H.J. Oertel" <oe@...t.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de,
	uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [Uclinux-dist-devel] [PATCH v3] add the driver for Analog Devices
 Blackfin on-chip CAN controllers

Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 04:11, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>> Barry Song wrote:
>>>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/init.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>>> I think you don't need "types.h" as the code no longer uses "uint*_t".
>> linux/types.h declares all types, like u* which this driver still uses
> 
> I just remember that "linux/types.h" needs to be added for the uint*_t
> types. At a first glance I do not see __u8/u8 being defined in that
> header file but I might have missed something.
> 
>>> Well, I'm still not a friend of the following inline functions,
>>> especially the *one-liners* which are called just *once*. With the usage
>>> of structs they seem even more useless.
>> seems like it would make more sense to not even use the read/write
>> functions either.  just declare the regs as volatile and assign/read
>> the struct directly.
> 
> Two times no. Don't use volatile and proper accessor functions. See:
> 
> http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v2.6.32/Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt

I was just wondering if bfin_read/write16 would not be the proper
accessor functions. readw/writew seems to be implemented differently:

http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v2.6.32/arch/blackfin/include/asm/io.h#L44

Puh, they do an cli,nop,nop,sync..sti for the access. This also nicely
shows why accessor functions should be used to access device registers.

Well, just curious. I don't really know the blackfin arch.

Wolfgang.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html