Date:	Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:22:18 +0200
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Regression in linux 2.6.32 virtio_net seen with
	vhost-net

On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:15:38PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 01:23:31 pm Herbert Xu wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 01:11:40PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > 
> > >    Thanks for the hint.  They seem to use NAPI for xmit cleanup, so that's
> > > what we should do?  I'll try, but such a rewrite doesn't belong in 2.6.32.
> > 
> > Well it depends.  Real drivers can't touch the hardware so they're
> > stuck with whatever the hardware does.  For virtio we do have the
> > flexibility of modifying the backend.
> > 
> > Having said that, for existing backends that will signal when there
> > is just a single free entry on the queue something like NAPI could
> > reduce the overhead associated with the IRQs.
> 
> OK, this is unfortunately untested, but wanted to send it out tonight:
> 
> virtio_net: use NAPI for xmit (UNTESTED)
> 
> This is closer to the way tg3 and ixgbe do it: use the NAPI framework to
> free transmitted packets.  It neatens things a little as well.

Looks very neat.

> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ struct virtnet_info
>  	struct napi_struct napi;
>  	unsigned int status;
>  
> +	/* We free packets and decide whether to restart xmit here. */
> +	struct napi_struct xmit_napi;
> +
>  	/* Number of input buffers, and max we've ever had. */
>  	unsigned int num, max;
>  
> @@ -60,6 +63,9 @@ struct virtnet_info
>  	struct sk_buff_head recv;
>  	struct sk_buff_head send;
>  
> +	/* Capacity left in xmit queue. */
> +	unsigned int capacity;
> +
>  	/* Work struct for refilling if we run low on memory. */
>  	struct delayed_work refill;
>  
> @@ -111,11 +117,8 @@ static void skb_xmit_done(struct virtque
>  {
>  	struct virtnet_info *vi = svq->vdev->priv;
>  
> -	/* Suppress further interrupts. */
> -	svq->vq_ops->disable_cb(svq);
> -
>  	/* We were probably waiting for more output buffers. */
> -	netif_wake_queue(vi->dev);
> +	napi_schedule(&vi->xmit_napi);
>  }
>  
>  static void receive_skb(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
> @@ -446,7 +449,7 @@ static unsigned int free_old_xmit_skbs(s
>  
>  	while ((skb = vi->svq->vq_ops->get_buf(vi->svq, &len)) != NULL) {
>  		pr_debug("Sent skb %p\n", skb);
> -		__skb_unlink(skb, &vi->send);
> +		skb_unlink(skb, &vi->send);
>  		vi->dev->stats.tx_bytes += skb->len;
>  		vi->dev->stats.tx_packets++;
>  		tot_sgs += skb_vnet_hdr(skb)->num_sg;
> @@ -455,6 +458,23 @@ static unsigned int free_old_xmit_skbs(s
>  	return tot_sgs;
>  }
>  
> +static int virtnet_xmit_poll(struct napi_struct *xmit_napi, int budget)
> +{
> +	struct virtnet_info *vi =
> +		container_of(xmit_napi, struct virtnet_info, xmit_napi);
> +
> +	if (netif_queue_stopped(vi->dev)) {

I am a bit concerned here: for example, on link down
you do netif_stop_queue, and start on link up.
So is it enough to check netif_queue_stopped
to verify that tx is not running and that this is because
it was out of capacity?

It would be very bad if this run in parallel with TX ...

If this is all safe, maybe add a comment explaining why ...

> +		vi->capacity += free_old_xmit_skbs(vi);
> +		if (vi->capacity >= 2 + MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
> +			/* Suppress further xmit interrupts. */
> +			vi->svq->vq_ops->disable_cb(vi->svq);
> +			napi_complete(xmit_napi);
> +			netif_wake_queue(vi->dev);
> +		}
> +	}
> +	return 1;
> +}
> +

One concern here: 
we are ignoring budget, is this an issue?


>  static int xmit_skb(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  {
>  	struct scatterlist sg[2+MAX_SKB_FRAGS];
> @@ -509,34 +529,22 @@ static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_
>  	struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
>  	int capacity;
>  
> -again:
> -	/* Free up any pending old buffers before queueing new ones. */
> -	free_old_xmit_skbs(vi);
> -
>  	/* Try to transmit */
> +	skb_queue_head(&vi->send, skb);
>  	capacity = xmit_skb(vi, skb);
>  
>  	/* This can happen with OOM and indirect buffers. */
>  	if (unlikely(capacity < 0)) {
> +		skb_unlink(skb, &vi->send);
>  		netif_stop_queue(dev);
>  		dev_warn(&dev->dev, "Unexpected full queue\n");
> -		if (unlikely(!vi->svq->vq_ops->enable_cb(vi->svq))) {
> -			vi->svq->vq_ops->disable_cb(vi->svq);
> -			netif_start_queue(dev);
> -			goto again;
> -		}
> +		/* If we missed an interrupt, we let virtnet_xmit_poll deal. */
> +		if (unlikely(!vi->svq->vq_ops->enable_cb(vi->svq)))
> +			napi_schedule(&vi->xmit_napi);
>  		return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
>  	}
>  	vi->svq->vq_ops->kick(vi->svq);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Put new one in send queue.  You'd expect we'd need this before
> -	 * xmit_skb calls add_buf(), since the callback can be triggered
> -	 * immediately after that.  But since the callback just triggers
> -	 * another call back here, normal network xmit locking prevents the
> -	 * race.
> -	 */
> -	__skb_queue_head(&vi->send, skb);
> +	vi->capacity = capacity;
>  
>  	/* Don't wait up for transmitted skbs to be freed. */
>  	skb_orphan(skb);
> @@ -544,15 +552,16 @@ again:
>  
>  	/* Apparently nice girls don't return TX_BUSY; stop the queue
>  	 * before it gets out of hand.  Naturally, this wastes entries. */
> -	if (capacity < 2+MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
> -		netif_stop_queue(dev);
> -		if (unlikely(!vi->svq->vq_ops->enable_cb(vi->svq))) {
> -			/* More just got used, free them then recheck. */
> -			capacity += free_old_xmit_skbs(vi);
> -			if (capacity >= 2+MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
> -				netif_start_queue(dev);
> -				vi->svq->vq_ops->disable_cb(vi->svq);
> -			}
> +	if (unlikely(capacity < 2+MAX_SKB_FRAGS)) {
> +		/* Free old skbs; might make more capacity. */
> +		vi->capacity = capacity + free_old_xmit_skbs(vi);
> +		if (unlikely(vi->capacity < 2+MAX_SKB_FRAGS)) {
> +			/* Make sure virtnet_xmit_poll sees updated capacity */
> +			wmb();
> +			netif_stop_queue(dev);

Doesn't netif_stop_queue include an atomic op?
If yes, does not atomic imply wmb already?

> +			/* Missed xmit irq? virtnet_xmit_poll will deal. */
> +			if (unlikely(!vi->svq->vq_ops->enable_cb(vi->svq)))
> +				napi_schedule(&vi->xmit_napi);
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> @@ -590,6 +599,7 @@ static int virtnet_open(struct net_devic
>  	struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
>  
>  	napi_enable(&vi->napi);
> +	napi_enable(&vi->xmit_napi);
>  
>  	/* If all buffers were filled by other side before we napi_enabled, we
>  	 * won't get another interrupt, so process any outstanding packets
> @@ -652,6 +662,7 @@ static int virtnet_close(struct net_devi
>  	struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
>  
>  	napi_disable(&vi->napi);
> +	napi_disable(&vi->xmit_napi);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -883,6 +894,7 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_d
>  	/* Set up our device-specific information */
>  	vi = netdev_priv(dev);
>  	netif_napi_add(dev, &vi->napi, virtnet_poll, napi_weight);
> +	netif_napi_add(dev, &vi->xmit_napi, virtnet_xmit_poll, 64);
>  	vi->dev = dev;
>  	vi->vdev = vdev;
>  	vdev->priv = vi;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists