netdev - Re: [BUG] 2.6.33-rc1 gianfar error message

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:27:57 +0100
From:	Michael Guntsche <mike@...loops.com>
To:	Kumar Gopalpet-B05799 <B05799@...escale.com>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.33-rc1 gianfar error message

On 2009.12.22 19:10:00 , Michael Guntsche wrote:
> Since you said that the first patch is not needed
> 
> @@ -2470,10 +2470,11 @@ static int gfar_process_frame(struct net_device
>         fcb = (struct rxfcb *)skb->data;
> 
>         /* Remove the FCB from the skb */
> -       skb_set_queue_mapping(skb, fcb->rq);
>         /* Remove the padded bytes, if there are any */
> -       if (amount_pull)
> +       if (amount_pull) {
> +               skb_set_queue_mapping(skb, fcb->rq);
>                 skb_pull(skb, amount_pull);
> +       }
> 
>         if (priv->rx_csum_enable)
>                 gfar_rx_checksum(skb, fcb);
> 
> I only applied the second one and tested again. Right after the reboot
> I got an error so apparently this change IS required as well. 

I tested this now in the opposite direction and apparently ONLY this
patch is needed. I commented out the second diff and did not get any
errors so far. Sorry for not testing this before sending my previous
mail.

Kind regards,
Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html