netdev - Re: [RFC 0/9] snet: Security for NETwork syscalls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 5 Jan 2010 08:09:17 -0600
From:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
To:	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc:	sam@...ack.fr, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	kaber@...sh.net, zbr@...emap.net, nhorman@...driver.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	hadi@...erus.ca
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/9] snet: Security for NETwork syscalls

Quoting Tetsuo Handa (penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp):
> Samir Bellabes wrote:
> > I'm currently testing security_sock_rcv_skb() hook - which is inside
> > sk_filter() - to get skbuffs when then are arriving, and so trying to
> > push the buffer to userspace. In case this is not userfull, userspace
> > is able to use the NFQUEUE of netfilter to get skbuff, and deal
> > with incoming datas.
> 
> Pushing buffer to userspace and wait for userspace's decision will sleep.
> sk_filter() which calls security_sock_rcv_skb() hook is called from
> (e.g.) tcp_v6_do_rcv() and comment of tcp_v6_do_rcv() says that
> "The socket must have it's spinlock held when we get here." 
> Also, comment of rxrpc_queue_rcv_skb() says that
> "the caller must hold a lock on call->lock".
> I think it is not permitted to do sleeping operation inside
> security_sock_rcv_skb().

Ah, there it is, thanks for finding a specific instance.  I'd looked
a bit yesterday but couldn't find it.

Tetsuo, would you mind sending a patch to add a note to security.h's
comment for socket_sock_rcv_skb: that it can't sleep?  It also used
to be the case for security_task_free() which presumably would be
hooked by the ssyscall or whatever was mentioned.

thanks,
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html