netdev - Re: [PATCH] netpoll: allow execution of multiple rx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:03:45 -0600
From:	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	danborkmann@...glemail.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	jmoyer@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, netdev@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netpoll: allow execution of multiple rx_hooks per
 interface

On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 15:59 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:21:48 -0600
> 
> > Looks pretty good. Dave?
> > 
> > Acked-by: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
> 
> I don't like the loop for RX ARP processing.
> 
> The packet contents aren't going to change, so doing basic
> packet validation inside of the "for each RX client" loop
> of arp_reply() doesn't make any sense.

True. Dan, please help our poor compilers with some manual loop
invariant motion.

-- 
http://selenic.com : development and support for Mercurial and Linux


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html