netdev - Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Optimize TCP sendmsg in favour of fast devices?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:41:26 -0800
From:	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To:	Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@...ibm.com>
CC:	davem@...emloft.net, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
	ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Optimize TCP sendmsg in favour of fast devices?

Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
> Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com> wrote on 01/15/2010 11:43:06 PM:
>>Multiple process tests may not be as easy in netperf as it is in
>>iperf, but under:
>>
>>ftp://ftp.netperf.org/netperf/misc
>>
>> I have a single-stream test script I use called runemomni.sh and an
>> example of its output, as well as an aggregate script I use called
>> runemomniagg2.sh - I'll post an example of its output there as
>> soon as I finish some runs.
> 
> 
> I usually run netperf for smaller number of threads and aggregate
> the output using some scripts. I will try what you suggested above,
> and see if I can get consistent results for higher number of
> processes. Thanks for the links.

You're welcome - the output of the aggregate script is up there too now 
- generally I run three systems for the aggregate tests and then include 
the TCP_MAERTs stuff, but in this case since I had only two otherwise 
identical systems, TCP_MAERTs would have been redundant.

rick jones
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html