lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:33:41 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 19 (vhost_net) On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:41:39AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:10:41 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20100118: > > > When CONFIG_TUN is not enabled: > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `get_socket': > net.c:(.text+0x2899a3): undefined reference to `tun_get_socket' > > > so VHOST_NET can either depend on TUN or select TUN, but if it > selects TUN, it will also need to select CRC32. > > --- > ~Randy Just to clarify sure, the broken configuration is VHOST=y TUN=m, I sent a fixup patch to forbid that configuration. But both VHOST=y TUN=n and VHOST=m TUN=n build fine for me on linux-next (commit af2b07e7e0a9c6bf82ce4d6a77f0412ae54f575b). Randy, could you please confirm that VHOST=y TUN=m is what you tested, or alternatively make your .config available to me so I can reproduce the problem? Thanks! -- MST -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists