netdev - Re: [Uclinux-dist-devel] [PATCH 1/6] netdev: bfin

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 21 Jan 2010 04:42:45 -0500
From:	Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, pmeerw@...erw.net,
	uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org
Subject: Re: [Uclinux-dist-devel] [PATCH 1/6] netdev: bfin_mac: handler RX 
	status errors

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 04:33, David Miller wrote:
> From: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 04:14, David Miller wrote:
>>> This patch set doesn't apply cleanly to net-next-2.6, please
>>> respin.
>>
>> i thought you said you merged the patch i sent out earlier ?
>> bfin_mac: use the newer CLKBUFOE bit name via asm/dpmc.h
>
> I did, to net-2.6 since it fixed a build.
>
> If you are sending me patches that depend upon net-2.6 changes,
> you have to mention that in your patch submission.

np

> Otherwise how do I know that I need to merge net-2.6 into
> net-next-2.6 in order to apply your patches?

it seems odd to me to have a "next" tree that doesnt include all of
the "now" changes, so i just assumed the tree state

not saying you should change your development flow, just pointing out
where the misunderstanding came from
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html