netdev - Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Optimize TCP sendmsg in favour of fast devices?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:06:25 +1300
From:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:	Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@...ibm.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
	ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Optimize TCP sendmsg in favour of fast devices?

On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:42:12PM +0530, Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
> 
> OK, I unset F_SG and set F_GSO (in driver). With this, tcpdump shows
> GSO is enabled - the tcp packet sizes builds up to 65160 bytes.
> 
> I ran 5 serial netperf's with 16K and another 5 serial netperfs
> with 64K I/O sizes, and the aggregate result is:
> 
> 0. Driver unsets F_SG but sets F_GSO:
>       Original code with 16K: 19471.65
>       New code with 16K:      19409.70
>       Original code with 64K: 21357.23
>       New code with 64K:      22050.42

OK this is more in line with what I was expecting, namely that
enabling GSO is actually beneficial even without SG.

It would be good to get the CPU utilisation figures so we can
see the complete picture.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html