netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC] r8169: straighten out overlength frame detection (v3)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:50:26 -0500
From:	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To:	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, ben@...adent.org.uk,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] r8169: straighten out overlength frame detection (v3)

On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 01:16:46AM +0100, Francois Romieu wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 10:45:04PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> [...]
> > In my opinion if you reset, you give them more power.
> > 
> > Instead of just dropping the next few frames, you allow them
> > to cause a drop of how ever many RX frames can arrive during
> > the reset period _PLUS_ the amount of other RX frames which
> > were in the receive ring at the point of detection.
> 
> Sure.
> 
> The fragmented frame test has been moved a few lines up, before checking
> for the status bits. Exceedingly small frames are detected and dropped
> as well.
> 
> I have spent the evening disrupting the communication. As a challenger
> one does not even need complete control : send a few random packets and
> the card goes to neverland. :o/
> 
> I'll do some tests limiting the crap at the first packet.
> 
Any further results you can share with us Francois?

Thanks
Neil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html