netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] skbuff: align sk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:26:51 -0800
From:	David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] skbuff: align sk_buff::cb to 64 bit

Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le samedi 30 janvier 2010 à 01:38 +0100, Felix Fietkau a écrit :
>> The alignment requirement for 64-bit load/store instructions on ARM is
>> implementation defined. Some CPUs (such as Marvell Feroceon) do not
>> generate an exception, if such an instruction is executed with an
>> address that is not 64 bit aligned. In such a case, the Feroceon
>> corrupts adjacent memory, which showed up
>> in my tests as a crash in the rx path of ath9k that only occured with
>> CONFIG_XFRM set. This crash happened, because the first field of the
>> mac80211 rx status info in the cb is an u64, and changing it corrupted
>> the skb->sp field.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>
>> Cc: stable@...nel.org
>> ---
>> --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
>> @@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ struct sk_buff {
>>  	 * want to keep them across layers you have to do a skb_clone()
>>  	 * first. This is owned by whoever has the skb queued ATM.
>>  	 */
>> -	char			cb[48];
>> +	char			cb[48] __aligned(8);
>>   	unsigned int		len,
>>  				data_len;
>>
>> --
> 
> Without a detailed analysis of holes added on x86_32 and/or x86_64, I
> guess this patch is not acceptable as is.
> 
> You certainly can find a better way to do this, without adding holes in
> sk_buff structure. Size matters a lot :)
> 

Can't we just move cb[] up so that it comes after an even number of 
pointers under all configs?

Then perhaps add __aligned(8) to the entire structure instead of just 
this field.

Alternatively, could you fix the driver so that it adds the necessary 
alignment to its use of the cb[] array?

How common it it to have sizeof(void *) == 4 *and* require 8-byte 
alignment on other things?  cb[] is fairly large, can you afford to burn 
4 bytes for alignment purposes in your driver?


David Daney
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html