lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:47:35 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	bhutchings@...arflare.com
Cc:	shemminger@...tta.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] net: Add support for ndo_select_queue()
 functions to cache the queue mapping

From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:34:34 +0000

> On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 10:00 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> Therefore the transmit hash and receiver hash will be different.
> 
> The intent here is to make it worthwhile to calculate that expensive
> hash on the TX side.

I would rather something like this be implemented in a way
which is device hash agnostic.

And I believe it is possible to do this.

Anyways, why can't you just propagate the RX queue used by the flow to
the socket TX hash?  We already store the RX queue in the SKB on
receive, the socket packet receive handling can simply propagate that
to the TX queue selector.

This would avoid having to do anything special in the driver's select
queue method.  In any event, overriding the queue selection method,
while not absolutely forbidden, is very much discouraged.  And if
this new scheme of yours creates another reason drivers will start
to override it, that's another negative in my book.

But most importantly, the last thing we want to do is calculate
something insane like Toeplitz, even if it's just once per connection.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ