netdev - Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/13] net: add checking to rcu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 14 Feb 2010 23:18:27 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	mingo@...e.hu
Cc:	eric.dumazet@...il.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
	dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, josh@...htriplett.org,
	dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
	dhowells@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/13] net: add checking to
 rcu_dereference() primitives

From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 09:23:14 +0100

> 
> * Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> 
>> Le jeudi 11 f??vrier 2010 ?? 16:00 -0800, Paul E. McKenney a ??crit :
>> > Update rcu_dereference() primitives to use new lockdep-based checking.
>> > The rcu_dereference() in __in6_dev_get() may be protected either by
>> > rcu_read_lock() or RTNL, per Eric Dumazet.  The rcu_dereference()
>> > in __sk_free() is protected by the fact that it is never reached if an
>> > update could change it.  Check for this by using rcu_dereference_check()
>> > to verify that the struct sock's ->sk_wmem_alloc counter is zero.
>> > 
>> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> 
>> CC to netdev and David Miller, network maintainer.
>> 
>> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
>> 
>> Thanks Paul, great work !
> 
> Dave, does this look good to you too? Cannot pick up the rest of the patchset 
> without these checks/annotations into the RCU tree as there's too many 
> warnings triggering in the networking code. So it's an all-or-nothing 
> patchset in that regard.

Looks good:

Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html