netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH v5 2/3] sysctl: add proc_do_large

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:45:44 +0800
From:	Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To:	opurdila@...acom.com
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Developers <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v5 2/3] sysctl: add proc_do_large_bitmap

Octavian Purdila wrote:
> 
> But I think its worth to keep the whitespaces in beetween, e.g. allow
> 
> $ echo '1, 2 ,3 ' >   ip_local_reserved_ports.


Sure.

> 
>> Also, if I write an invalid value, it does reject this, but the previous
>> value in that file is cleared, shouldn't we keep the previous one?
>>
>>
> 
> The only way I see to fix this is to return EINVAL if we detect a write with offset.


Yeah, we shouldn't continue once we find any invalid value.

> 
> IMO we should do that for the other proc write routines as well, as otherwise ther result is confusing, e.g.
> 
> write("1 2"); write(" 3");
> 
> will set first value in the vector to 1, than second value to 2 then *first* value to 3.
> 
> I am all for it, but again, this changes userspace ABI. 

Sorry, is this related with the problem I mentioned above? Both "1 2"
and " 3" are valid values.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html