lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:54:13 -0800 From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...il.com> To: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH] e1000: convert to use netdev_for_each_mc_addr On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com> > --- > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++-------------------- > 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c > index 3b14dd7..c99f95c 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c > +++ b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c > @@ -2161,29 +2161,26 @@ static void e1000_set_rx_mode(struct net_device *netdev) > > WARN_ON(i == rar_entries); > > - mc_ptr = netdev->mc_list; > - > - for (; i < rar_entries; i++) { > - if (mc_ptr) { > - e1000_rar_set(hw, mc_ptr->da_addr, i); > - mc_ptr = mc_ptr->next; > - } else { > - E1000_WRITE_REG_ARRAY(hw, RA, i << 1, 0); > - E1000_WRITE_FLUSH(); > - E1000_WRITE_REG_ARRAY(hw, RA, (i << 1) + 1, 0); > - E1000_WRITE_FLUSH(); > + netdev_for_each_mc_addr(mc_ptr, netdev) { > + if (i == rar_entries) { > + /* load any remaining addresses into the hash table */ > + u32 hash_reg, hash_bit, mta; > + hash_value = e1000_hash_mc_addr(hw, mc_ptr->da_addr); > + hash_reg = (hash_value >> 5) & 0x7F; > + hash_bit = hash_value & 0x1F; > + mta = (1 << hash_bit); > + mcarray[hash_reg] |= mta; > + } > + else { nit - else should be in the same line like "} else {" > + e1000_rar_set(hw, mc_ptr->da_addr, i++); > } > } > > - /* load any remaining addresses into the hash table */ > - > - for (; mc_ptr; mc_ptr = mc_ptr->next) { > - u32 hash_reg, hash_bit, mta; > - hash_value = e1000_hash_mc_addr(hw, mc_ptr->da_addr); > - hash_reg = (hash_value >> 5) & 0x7F; > - hash_bit = hash_value & 0x1F; > - mta = (1 << hash_bit); > - mcarray[hash_reg] |= mta; > + for (; i < rar_entries; i++) { > + E1000_WRITE_REG_ARRAY(hw, RA, i << 1, 0); > + E1000_WRITE_FLUSH(); > + E1000_WRITE_REG_ARRAY(hw, RA, (i << 1) + 1, 0); > + E1000_WRITE_FLUSH(); > } > > /* write the hash table completely, write from bottom to avoid otherwise seems okay. Thanks for your work on cleaning this stuff, we'll be testing it as part of the net next testing already going on. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists