netdev - Re: [RFC][PATCH] af_unix: Add peer inode to /proc/net/unix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 1 Mar 2010 15:05:50 +0800
From:	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
To:	Kenan Kalajdzic <kenan@...x.ba>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] af_unix: Add peer inode to /proc/net/unix

On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Kenan Kalajdzic <kenan@...x.ba> wrote:
>  net/unix/af_unix.c |    9 ++++++++-
>  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
> index f255119..e778428 100644
> --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
> +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
> @@ -2157,7 +2157,7 @@ static int unix_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>                seq_puts(seq, "Num       RefCount Protocol Flags    Type St "
>                         "Inode Path\n");
>        else {
> -               struct sock *s = v;
> +               struct sock *s = v, *peer;
>                struct unix_sock *u = unix_sk(s);
>                unix_state_lock(s);
>
> @@ -2186,6 +2186,13 @@ static int unix_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>                        }
>                        for ( ; i < len; i++)
>                                seq_putc(seq, u->addr->name->sun_path[i]);
> +               } else {
> +                       peer = unix_peer(s);
> +                       if (peer) {
> +                               unix_state_lock(peer);
> +                               seq_printf(seq, " peer=%lu", sock_i_ino(peer));
> +                               unix_state_unlock(peer);
> +                       }
>                }
>                unix_state_unlock(s);
>                seq_putc(seq, '\n');

If there are two read requests, the system maybe locked up. please use
unix_state_double_lock()/unix_state_double_unlock(), instead. And the
file isn't consistent with the old one. You'd better use a column
title "Peer" instead of "peer=".

-- 
Regards，
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@...il.com)