[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 22:12:15 +0800
From: "Zhu, Yi" <yi.zhu@...el.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
"Pekka Savola (ipv6)" <pekkas@...core.fi>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 2/7] tcp: use limited socket backlog
Eric Dumazet [mailto:eric.dumazet@...il.com] wrote:
> Le mercredi 03 mars 2010 à 17:06 +0800, Zhu Yi a écrit :
>> I simply follow how the code is originally written. As you can see,
>> tcp_v4_do_rcv() doesn't always do so. And in the backlog queuing place,
>> we don't even bother to check.
> You add a new point where a packet can be dropped, this should be
> accounted for, so that admins can have a clue whats going on.
> Previously, packet was always queued, and dropped later (and accounted)
In case of the skb doesn't have a MD5 option while we are expecting one, or we
failed to find the sk for the skb connection request, etc, the skb is dropped silently in
tcp_v4_do_rcv(). No?
> Not everybody runs drop monitor :)
Thanks,
-yi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists