lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 3 Mar 2010 22:12:15 +0800
From:	"Zhu, Yi" <yi.zhu@...el.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
	"Pekka Savola (ipv6)" <pekkas@...core.fi>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 2/7] tcp: use limited socket backlog

Eric Dumazet [mailto:eric.dumazet@...il.com] wrote:
> Le mercredi 03 mars 2010 à 17:06 +0800, Zhu Yi a écrit :

>> I simply follow how the code is originally written. As you can see,
>> tcp_v4_do_rcv() doesn't always do so. And in the backlog queuing place,
>> we don't even bother to check.

> You add a new point where a packet can be dropped, this should be
> accounted for, so that admins can have a clue whats going on.

> Previously, packet was always queued, and dropped later (and accounted)

In case of the skb doesn't have a MD5 option while we are expecting one, or we
failed to find the sk for the skb connection request, etc, the skb is dropped silently in
tcp_v4_do_rcv(). No?

> Not everybody runs drop monitor :)

Thanks,
-yi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ