[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 02:15:52 -0700
From: "Vladislav Zolotarov" <vladz@...adcom.com>
To: "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
cc: "fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp" <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Eilon Greenstein" <eilong@...adcom.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] bnx2x: use the dma state API instead of the pci
equivalents
According to the changes in a PCI-DMA-mapping.txt it sounds like the trend is to stop using the pci_dma_* API and start using the dma_* API instead. Does this mean that using the pci_dma_* API is deprecated?
Thanks,
vlad
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net]
> Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2010 11:39 AM
> To: Vladislav Zolotarov
> Cc: fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp; netdev@...r.kernel.org;
> Eilon Greenstein
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] bnx2x: use the dma state API instead of
> the pci equivalents
>
> From: "Vladislav Zolotarov" <vladz@...adcom.com>
> Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 01:19:07 -0700
>
> > So, if we don't need to use pci_X() interface anymore, lets replace
> > pci_X() properly all over the bnx2x with dma_X() functions.
>
> I think Fujita's plan of gradual and partial transformations is
> legitimate, and his changes shouldn't be rejected because he simply
> isn't modifying all of the interfaces used by this driver but rather
> just a specific subset he is trying to transform across the tree.
>
> Please rescind your objections.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists