netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/1] add ethtool loopback support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:55:41 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To:	Laurent Chavey <chavey@...gle.com>
Cc:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, therbert@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] add ethtool loopback support

Don't top-post.

On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 09:43 -0700, Laurent Chavey wrote:
> isn't the existing ETHTOOL_TEST ioctl use for something like self test ?
> 
> the intent of this patch is to enable a mode whereby one could run
> netperf / iperf and other application  and have the packets sent and
> received by the driver.
[...]

If you send to a local address, the traffic will be routed over the
internal loopback interface.  Applications will not use a network
interface in loopback unless they override routing or send raw packets.
netperf and iperf don't allow you todo that, so far as I'm ware.

Also those applications are *performance* tests; they are not very
useful for fault-finding.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html