netdev - Re: rps perfomance WAS(Re: rps: question

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 16 Apr 2010 07:56:28 +0800
From:	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
To:	hadi@...erus.ca
Cc:	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
	therbert@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, robert@...julf.net,
	andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: rps perfomance WAS(Re: rps: question

On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 4:16 AM, jamal <hadi@...erus.ca> wrote:
>
> Sounds interesting.
> Wikipedia information overload. Any arch description of the HP9000?
> Did your scheme use IPIs to message the other CPUs?
>

If you doubt the cost of smp_call_function_single(), how about having
a try with my another patch, which implements the similar of RPS, but
uses kernel threads instead, so no explicit IPI.

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/38319/


-- 
Regards，
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@...il.com)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html