netdev - Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 1/2] Add ndo_set_vf_port

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:15:58 -0700
From:	Chris Wright <chrisw@...hat.com>
To:	Scott Feldman <scofeldm@...co.com>
Cc:	"Rose, Gregory V" <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"chrisw@...hat.com" <chrisw@...hat.com>,
	"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
	"Williams, Mitch A" <mitch.a.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 1/2] Add ndo_set_vf_port_profile

* Scott Feldman (scofeldm@...co.com) wrote:
> Hmmm...seems IFLA_NUM_VF assumes a PCI device supporting SR-IOV when it uses
> dev_num_vf().  I think a better option would have been to query the device
> for the number of VFs, without assuming SR-IOV or even PCI.
> 
> I see a ndo_get_num_vf() coming...

That was discussed when the patch originally merged.  The proposal to make
get/set symmetric.  Right now it's an unusual mix of sets + one
collective get.

thanks,
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html