netdev - Re: [PATCHv2] netfilter: Remove skb_is_nonlinear check from nf_conntrack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 14 May 2010 12:26:01 -0600
From:	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc:	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] netfilter: Remove skb_is_nonlinear check from
	nf_conntrack_sip

On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 08:13:03PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Your patch is based on an old version, the current version also
> supports TCP. I'll commit this patch to my tree after some testing.

Thanks!

> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.c
> index b20f427..45750cc 100644
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.c
> @@ -1393,10 +1393,8 @@ static int sip_help_tcp(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int protoff,
>  
>  	nf_ct_refresh(ct, skb, sip_timeout * HZ);
>  
> -	if (skb_is_nonlinear(skb)) {
> -		pr_debug("Copy of skbuff not supported yet.\n");
> +	if (unlikely(skb_linearize(skb)))
>  		return NF_ACCEPT;
> -	}

Should this be NF_DROP? As I understand it skb_linearize only failes
if it runs out of memory, which probably means dropping is OK. But
passing a packet that might need rewriting could be harmful..

Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html