netdev - UDP Fragmentation and DF bit..

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 26 May 2010 18:45:47 -0700
From:	"Vincent, Pradeep" <pradeepv@...zon.com>
To:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: UDP Fragmentation and DF bit..

After running into issues with UDP in multi-MTU network environment, I
started digging through the code and found somewhat inconsistent behavior
(if I read the code right)

OMan 7 ip¹ declares that ³The  system-wide  default  is  controlled  by  the
ip_no_pmtu_disc  sysctl  for SOCK_STREAM  sockets,  and  disabled  on all
others.² which led me to think ODF¹ bit will not be set for UDP packets.
But..

The code in ip_output.c seems to do the following,

1. If packet size <= current PMTU, then set the DF=1 and send the packet
out.
2. If packet size > current PMTU, then set DF=0 and send the packet out
after fragmentation.

In a network environment where MTU-big and MTU-small co-exist (and have
router¹s fragmentation turned off in favor of PMTU discovery), UDP packets
that are > MTU-small and < MTU-big find the PMTU effectively but UDP packets
that are > MTU-big get dropped. This looks like inconsistent behavior to me
and doesn¹t seem to match the advertised behavior.

Is there a reason why PMTU support for UDP is somewhat inconsistent ?

Is there a reason ODF¹ bit cannot be set on fragmented packets on UDP
transmission ? I couldn¹t find anything in RFC for IP protocol that
prohibited DF bit on fragmented packets. Did I miss
something here ?

Would it be reasonable if PMTU discovery is performed (DF bit set +
appropriate icmp logic) even for locally fragmented packets ? I think this
will be a great help for UDP users that don¹t have PMTU handling logic in
the application (most udp applications belong to this category in my
experience). Thoughts ?

Thanks,

- Pradeep Vincent

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html