netdev - Re: [Patch] infiniband: check local reserved ports

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 04 Jun 2010 09:04:53 -0700
From:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To:	Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
	davem@...emloft.net, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
	sean.hefty@...el.com
Subject: Re: [Patch] infiniband: check local reserved ports

 > > Should this inet_is_reserved_local_port() test apply to all the "port
 > > spaces" that this code is handling?  I honestly am ignorant of the
 > > intended semantics of the new local_reserved_ports stuff, hence my question.

 > Yes, but I only found this case, is there any else?

My question was more in the other direction: should this test apply to
all the "port spaces" handled here?  From looking at the code, it
appears the answer is yes -- it seems that putting a port in
local_reserved_ports reserves that port for IPv4 and IPv6, UDP, TCP,
SCTP, DCCP, everything, so we should probably reserve all RDMA CM ports too.
-- 
Roland Dreier <rolandd@...co.com> || For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html