netdev - Re: [PATCH] act_mirred: don't clone skb when skb isn't shared

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 05 Jun 2010 09:24:59 -0400
From:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To:	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] act_mirred: don't clone skb when skb isn't shared

On Sat, 2010-06-05 at 21:07 +0800, Changli Gao wrote:

> Thanks. BTW: act_nat.c doesn't obey the following rule, and you plan
> to remove TC_MUNGED and TC_OK2MUNGE?

> 2) If you munge any packet thou shalt call pskb_expand_head in the case
> someone else is referencing the skb. After that you "own" the skb.
> You must also tell us if it is ok to munge the packet (TC_OK2MUNGE),
> this way any action downstream can stomp on the packet.

That rule still applies but it is upto the discretion of the action.
i.e if the act_nat thinks it is ok for others down the street to trample
on the packet, it should tell us so. Maybe i should change the wording
to use the word "may" in that 3rd sentence.
[I will kill (low prio) TC_OK2MUNGE but not TC_MUNGED.]

cheers,
jamal

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html