netdev - Re: [RFC patch net/next] net: Hoist assigns from if?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:59:10 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc:	joe@...ches.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC patch net/next] net: Hoist assigns from if?

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 07:42:06 +0200

> Quite honestly, this kind of patch sucks, because it pollutes 'git
> blame' output. Its hard to point out the origin of a particular
> bug/code, and we have to spend precious time playing with complex git
> commands to go over cleanup patches.

I have to agree with Eric on this.

Pundits of these changes will argue that this is a deficiency in
git itself.

But that to me just means that until git has a friendlier way to
walk backwards through blame information for a line to skip past
the cleanup crapola, we shouldn't make a lot of these kinds of
changes.

So that means I'm really not excited to see this kind of patch
submitted, it's just noise that hurts scanning through history
and thus hurts development.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html