netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/8] user_ns: Introduce user_nsmap_uid and user_ns_map

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 15 Jun 2010 12:02:17 +0400
From:	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	Serge Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>,
	Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...e.fr>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] user_ns: Introduce user_nsmap_uid and user_ns_map_gid.

On 06/13/2010 05:28 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> 
> Define what happens when a we view a uid from one user_namespace
> in another user_namepece.
> 
> - If the user namespaces are the same no mapping is necessary.
> 
> - For most cases of difference use overflowuid and overflowgid,
>   the uid and gid currently used for 16bit apis when we have a 32bit uid
>   that does fit in 16bits.  Effectively the situation is the same,
>   we want to return a uid or gid that is not assigned to any user.
> 
> - For the case when we happen to be mapping the uid or gid of the
>   creator of the target user namespace use uid 0 and gid as confusing
>   that user with root is not a problem.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>

I suppose this one should go via Andrew, not Dave.

Anyway, Acked-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html