Date:	Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:30:41 +0200
From:	Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
To:	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
CC:	socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] socketcan: add a driver for FlexCAN controllers.

On 06/18/2010 01:53 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> On 06/18/2010 01:21 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>> On 06/18/2010 12:44 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>>>> Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>>>> On 06/18/2010 12:16 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>>>>>> Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Hans-Jürgen,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 06/17/2010 12:52 PM, Hans J. Koch wrote:
>>>>>>>> This adds a driver for FlexCAN based CAN controllers,
>>>>>>>> e.g. found in Freescale i.MX35 SoCs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The original version of this driver was posted by Sascha Hauer in July 2009:
>>>>>>>> http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-netdev/2009/7/29/6251621
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I took this version, added NAPI support, and fixed some problems found
>>>>>>>> during testing. Well, here is the result. Please review.
>>>>>>> I briefly browsed the patch and various bits and pieces are missing or
>>>>>>> not correctly implemented. Marc already pointed out a few of them:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - I do not find can_put/get_echo_skb functions in the code. How is
>>>>>>>   IFF_ECHO supposed to work?
>>>>>> the driver uses hardware loopback
>>>>> OK, then
>>>>>
>>>>>   dev = alloc_candev(sizeof(struct flexcan_priv), 0);
>>>>>
>>>>> should be used (and TX_ECHO_SKB_MAX removed) in Hans-Jürgens driver.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Support for CAN_CTRLMODE_BERR_REPORTING and do_get_berr_counter()
>>>>>>>   seems to be missing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Make use of alloc_can_skb() and alloc_can_err_skb().
>>>>>> the last two points are already addressed in my version of the driver.
>>>>> I do not see support for CAN_CTRLMODE_BERR_REPORTING in your driver
>>>>> (which has nothing to do with do_get_berr_counter).
>>>> oh yes...sorry, got confused.
>>>>
>>>> However I implemented CAN_CTRLMODE_BERR_REPORTING, i.e. turning of the
>>>> bit error interrupts by default. This has the effect that no bus warning
>>>> and bus passive interrupt was signalled.
>>>>
>>>> I should add a comment to my driver.
>>>
>>> I'm confused, CAN_CTRLMODE_BERR_REPORTING means that the user can enable
>>> bus error reporting, which seems not be handled in the driver your sent.
>>> See:
>>>
>>> http://lxr.linux.no/linux/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000.c#L134
>>> http://lxr.linux.no/linux/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000.c#L588
>>
>> Which interrupts does "IRQ_BEI" include? What should
>> CAN_CTRLMODE_BERR_REPORTING do?
>>
>> Looking at:
>> http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.34/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000.c#L393
>> it seems that BEI on the SJA just effects bit, form and stuff errors.
> 
> Yes, it effects *bus errors*... actually the one you handle in
> at91_poll_err_frame(). Especially the AT91_IRQ_AERR does cause the
> infamous interrupt flooding (which is, btw, not treated correctly as
> bus error in your driver).
> 
>> If I disable the corresponding interrupt in the flexcan. This is
>> ERR_MSK, (1 << 14 in CTRL), I don't get error warning or error passive
>> interrupts either. I'm not sure about the bus off interrupt.
> 
> Hm, my understanding is that you can disable those bus error
> interrupts individually via AT91_IRQ_ERR_FRAME.
> 
>> From my point of view this is not that what CAN_CTRLMODE_BERR_REPORTING
>> should do, is it?
> 
> It should *not* disable state change interrupts, of course. I have
> started to fix some issues in the at91 driver some time ago, which 
> I have attached below.

Sorry, I drifted away to the at91 driver. If the flexcan hardware does
not allow to disable bus error reporting individually, just do *not*
support CAN_CTRLMODE_BERR_REPORTING, as you already do in your patch.

Wolfgang.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists