lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 25 Jun 2010 18:10:08 +0300
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert.xu@...hat.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: dhclient, checksum and tap

Hi!
I've been looking at the issue of checksum on
dhcp packets: to recap, 8dc4194474159660d7f37c495e3fc3f10d0db8cc
added a way for af_packet sockets to get the packet status.
Unfortunately not all dhcp clients caught up with
this development, so they are still broken
when both server and client run on the same host,
e.g. with bridge+tap.

And of course virtualization adds another way to run
old dhcp clients, so userspace virtio net in qemu has
a hack to detect DHCP and fill in the checksum.
I guess we could add this in vhost, as well.

However, one wonders whether the tap driver is a better place
for this work-around, that would help all users.
Any objections against putting such code in tap?

-- 
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ