netdev - Re: [PATCH 4/9] cxgb4vf: Add code to provision T4 PCI-E SR-IOV Virtual Functions with hardware resources

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 28 Jun 2010 09:55:07 -0700
From:	Casey Leedom <leedom@...lsio.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] cxgb4vf: Add code to provision T4 PCI-E SR-IOV Virtual Functions with hardware resources

| From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
| Date: Saturday, June 26, 2010 06:37 am
| 
| I wonder if it would be cleaner to move the guts of the last hunk
| into a function (e.g. adap_init_sriov()) and have that be a dummy
| function in the case that CONFIG_PCI_IOV in the first hunk is not set.

  I have no objection to this.  I'd like to do minor tuning work like that as a 
follow on rather than respin the patch.  But, as I said in my submission, I'm 
not familiar with this process so if making changes like the above is required 
I'll definitely jump on it.  I don't know what issues are "critical show 
stoppers" and which ones are "nice to have" once things are in place.

  Thanks for your comments!

Casey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html