netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] IB/{nes,ipoib}: Pass supported flags to ethtool_op_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 03 Jul 2010 13:08:29 -0700
From:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Roland Dreier <rolandd@...co.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com, sgruszka@...hat.com,
	amit.salecha@...gic.com, amwang@...hat.com,
	anirban.chakraborty@...gic.com, dm@...lsio.com, scofeldm@...co.com,
	vkolluri@...co.com, roprabhu@...co.com,
	e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, buytenh@...tstofly.org,
	gallatin@...i.com, brice@...i.com, shemminger@...ux-foundation.org,
	jgarzik@...hat.com, Faisal Latif <faisal.latif@...el.com>,
	Chien Tung <chien.tin.tung@...el.com>,
	linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] IB/{nes,ipoib}: Pass supported flags to ethtool_op_set_flags()

 > Following commit 1437ce3983bcbc0447a0dedcd644c14fe833d266 "ethtool:
 > Change ethtool_op_set_flags to validate flags", ethtool_op_set_flags
 > takes a third parameter and cannot be used directly as an
 > implementation of ethtool_ops::set_flags.

I assume this commit is in one of Dave's trees and breaks nes and ipoib
because it changed the ethtool_op_set_flags prototype?

 > Dave, Roland, you'd better decide between yourselves should apply this.

Since this depends on a commit already in Dave's tree, Dave should
probably take it into the same tree.  I guess there's no way to roll
this into the original patch to avoid breaking bisects once this ends up
upstream?

anyway,

Acked-by: Roland Dreier <rolandd@...co.com>

 > +static int nes_netdev_set_flags(struct net_device *netdev, u32 flags)
 > +{
 > +	return ethtool_op_set_flags(netdev, flags, ETH_FLAG_LRO);
 > +}
 > +
 > +
 >  static const struct ethtool_ops nes_ethtool_ops = {

Also would have been a bit nicer to avoid adding a double blank line
here, although that's obviously a trivial issue.

 - R.
-- 
Roland Dreier <rolandd@...co.com> || For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html