netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] tg3: 64bits stats

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 05 Jul 2010 19:41:03 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Matt Carlson <mcarlson@...adcom.com>,
	Michael Chan <mchan@...adcom.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] tg3: 64bits stats

On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 20:07 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le lundi 05 juillet 2010 à 18:31 +0100, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
> > On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 18:03 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > Le lundi 05 juillet 2010 à 11:14 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> > > > After commit be1f3c2c027c (net: Enable 64-bit net device statistics on
> > > > 32-bit architectures), we can now provide 64bit stats, even on 32bit
> > > > arches.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> > > > ---
> > > 
> > > Please disregard this patch.
> > > 
> > > There is small possibility a reader might read a 64bit value while
> > > another writer makes a change to it, changing high 32bit value.
> > > 
> > > A change in core network would be needed to make this 100% safe,
> > > possibly using a seqlock to protect dev->stats64
> > 
> > I really didn't want to add this overhead and complication to readers
> > when only some drivers need it.
> > 
> 
> Overhead would be minimal, only in get_stats() method and only for
> drivers that want to provide 64 bit stats...
> 
> Clearly, rx/tx path must not have any overhead.
> 
> Right now, even RTNL 64bit stats are not safe.

Ugh, I was assuming that callers of dev_get_stats() would hold
dev_base_lock.  However only netstat_show() seems to do so currently.

Ben.

> Should we revert prior patches or try to make progress ?
> 
> 
> 
-- 
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html