lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 9 Jul 2010 15:43:47 +0400
From:	Kulikov Vasiliy <segooon@...il.com>
To:	Denis Kirjanov <dkirjanov@...a.kernel.org>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, john.linn@...inx.com, brian.hill@...inx.com,
	grant.likely@...retlab.ca, jpirko@...hat.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -net-2.6] ll_temac: fix DMA resources leak

On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 20:24 +0000, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> V2: Check pointers before releasing resources.
> 
> Fix DMA resources leak.
> Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <dkirjanov@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kulikov Vasiliy <segooon@...il.com>
> ---
>  1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ll_temac_main.c b/drivers/net/ll_temac_main.c
> index fa303c8..b57d0ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ll_temac_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ll_temac_main.c
> @@ -193,6 +193,35 @@ static int temac_dcr_setup(struct temac_local *lp, struct of_device *op,
>  #endif
>  
>  /**
> + *  * temac_dma_bd_release - Release buffer descriptor rings
> + */
> +static void temac_dma_bd_release(struct net_device *ndev)
> +{
> +	struct temac_local *lp = netdev_priv(ndev);
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < RX_BD_NUM; i++) {
> +		if (!lp->rx_skb[i])
> +			break;
> +		else {
> +			dma_unmap_single(ndev->dev.parent, lp->rx_bd_v[i].phys,
> +					XTE_MAX_JUMBO_FRAME_SIZE, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> +			dev_kfree_skb(lp->rx_skb[i]);
> +		}
> +	}
This cycle is needed only if (lp->rx_skb != NULL).

> +	if (lp->rx_bd_v)
> +		dma_free_coherent(ndev->dev.parent,
> +				sizeof(*lp->rx_bd_v) * RX_BD_NUM,
> +				lp->rx_bd_v, lp->rx_bd_p);
> +	if (lp->tx_bd_v)
> +		dma_free_coherent(ndev->dev.parent,
> +				sizeof(*lp->tx_bd_v) * TX_BD_NUM,
> +				lp->tx_bd_v, lp->tx_bd_p);
After temac_dma_bd_release() lp->rx_bd_v and lp->rx_bd_p are freed but
are nonzero. If lp->rx_skb allocation fails second time then these DMA's
would be freed second time.
lp->tx_bd_v = lp->rx_bd_v = NULL here fixes this.

> +	if (lp->rx_skb)
> +		kfree(lp->rx_skb);
> +}
> +
> +/**
>   * temac_dma_bd_init - Setup buffer descriptor rings
>   */
>  static int temac_dma_bd_init(struct net_device *ndev)
> @@ -275,6 +304,7 @@ static int temac_dma_bd_init(struct net_device *ndev)
>  	return 0;
>  
>  out:
> +	temac_dma_bd_release(ndev);
>  	return -ENOMEM;
>  }
>  
> @@ -858,6 +888,8 @@ static int temac_stop(struct net_device *ndev)
>  		phy_disconnect(lp->phy_dev);
>  	lp->phy_dev = NULL;
>  
> +	temac_dma_bd_release(ndev);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists