netdev - Re: [rfc] Merging the Open vSwitch datapath

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:48:27 +0900
From:	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To:	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Cc:	"Rose, Gregory V" <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>,
	Ben Pfaff <blp@...ira.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [rfc] Merging the Open vSwitch datapath

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 01:59:07PM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Rose, Gregory V (gregory.v.rose@...el.com) wrote:
> > >From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:blp@...ira.com]
> > >On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:26:17AM -0700, Rose, Gregory V wrote:
> > >> I just want to put in a plug for the netlink interface.  For NICs with
> > >> EVB we'll need it.
> > >
> > >Off-hand, the main reasons to use Netlink, instead of the existing
> > >character device interface, are that Netlink is easier to extend and
> > >that it should reduce or eliminate the 32-to-64 bit compat layer
> > >currently in the Open vSwitch tree.
> 
> That, plus it's a typical way to do network configuration.  Esp. with
> bi-directional communication.  So the userspace bit both listens to
> netlink messages, like any of the routing daemons or lldpad or similar
> do, and sends netlink messasges to update driver's flow table.
> 
> BTW, this kind of discussion was why Herbert felt strongly against
> drivers/staging/.  He wanted to be sure the interfaces were well-defined
> first.

Hi Chris,

Is the implication that there is a preference for finalising
the interface (as much as that is possible) before merging?

[ snip ]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html