netdev - Re: [PATCH net-2.6] 3c59x: Remove incorrect locking; correct documented lock hierarchy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:38:15 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	ben@...adent.org.uk
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6] 3c59x: Remove incorrect locking; correct
 documented lock hierarchy

From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 01:15:33 +0100

> vortex_ioctl() was grabbing vortex_private::lock around its call to
> generic_mii_ioctl().  This is no longer necessary since there are more
> specific locks which the mdio_{read,write}() functions will obtain.
> Worse, those functions do not save and restore IRQ flags when locking
> the MII state, so interrupts will be enabled when generic_mii_ioctl()
> returns.
> 
> Since there is currently no need for any function to call
> mdio_{read,write}() while holding another spinlock, do not change them
> to save and restore IRQ flags but remove the specification of ordering
> between vortex_private::lock and vortex_private::mii_lock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
> ---
> I've now borrowed a card to test 3c59x on.  I've seen another regression
> reported <http://bugs.debian.org/586967> after my locking changes, which
> I can't reproduce.

I think the lock is necessary, in some form.

Nothing otherwise protects vp->mii, which is accessed and modified by
not just this ioctl, but also ethtool operation calls.

So we can't apply your patch as-is.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html