netdev - Re: ERR_PTR pattern in phylib

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 01 Sep 2010 08:27:29 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	grant.likely@...retlab.ca
Cc:	afleming@...escale.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: ERR_PTR pattern in phylib

From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 08:42:49 -0600

> It seems to me that phylib is one of the cases where the users (the
> network drivers) don't actually care about the specific error code
> when calling phylib functions.  The drivers only seem to care whether
> or not the function failed, and if it did then bail out.  I've also
> noticed that using the "if (!ptr)" test on phylib return values is a
> common error for driver writers.
> 
> In the interest of making driver code easier to write and review,
> would you be opposed to a set of patches to remove the ERR_PTR()
> pattern from phylib and its users?

I'm opposed to it because it means that if code actually does
care about the error code it will no longer be able to obtain
it.

Please don't make this change, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html