netdev - Re: [PATCH net-2.6] 3c59x: Remove incorrect locking; correct documented lock hierarchy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 02 Sep 2010 01:42:58 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6] 3c59x: Remove incorrect locking; correct
 documented lock hierarchy

On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 17:37 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
> Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 23:08:27 +0100
> 
> > I think this is safe after all because ethtool and MII ioctls are all
> > serialised by the RTNL.
> 
> Well since you said that there was a regression that you're unable
> to reproduce, I was trying to find a probably cause for it :-)
> 
> I think you should work to resolve that report, and resend this
> locking patch once that is sorted out.

That regression seems to due to my *earlier* changes to locking.  This
new patch fixes a different regression I found while trying to reproduce
that, and it has not been applied in Debian yet.  Sorry for the
ambiguous wording.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)