netdev - Re: [PATCH] [arch-x86] Allow SRAT integrity check to be skipped

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 2 Sep 2010 12:03:08 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, andi@...stfloor.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [arch-x86] Allow SRAT integrity check to be skipped

> This isnt a particularly useful solution to users of said systems - they 
> have to figure out that this option exists, and then they have to enter 
> this option on the boot line.

This usually only happens in early preproduction systems. So far
the BIOS always got fixed before they shipped to users.

But it's still useful to have this option so that the early
users have a workaround.

It's difficult to maintain DMI strings for early systems,
they are too bleeding edge and the entries would be stale
as soon as the BIOS is fixed.

-Andi


-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html