netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] [arch-x86] Allow SRAT integrity check to be skipped

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:33:12 +0200
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
Cc:	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, andi@...stfloor.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] [arch-x86] Allow SRAT integrity check to be skipped

On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 15:59 -0700, Peter P Waskiewicz Jr wrote:

> +static int srat_bypass_bios;
> +
> +static int __init srat_bypass_bios_setup(char *str)
> +{
> +        srat_bypass_bios = 1;
> +        return 0;
> +}
> +early_param("sratbypassbios", srat_bypass_bios_setup);
> +
>  /* Use the information discovered above to actually set up the nodes. */
>  int __init acpi_scan_nodes(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
>  {

I wonder, since all the things using the variable are __init, could it
be as well? Just curious really.

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html