lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 08:34:09 -0700 (PDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, linville@...driver.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] netpoll: use non-BH variant of RCU From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:26:25 -0700 > softirq: adjust error check > > The error check for _local_bh_enable_ip() warns on both in_irq() and > irqs_disabled(). The check for in_irq() is necessary, because a hardirq > might well have interrupted bh execution, in which case it is simply > not possible for the hardirq to exclude the bh that got interrupted. > > However, it is perfectly reasonable to disable bh while hardirqs are > disabled, and this in fact promotes common code. This commit therefore > removes the irqs_disabled() check. > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists