netdev - Re: [PATCHv4] net: Add batman-adv meshing protocol

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 08 Sep 2010 09:14:29 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Sven Eckelmann <sven.eckelmann@....de>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	b.a.t.m.a.n@...ts.open-mesh.net
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4] net: Add batman-adv meshing protocol

Sven Eckelmann <sven.eckelmann@....de> writes:

> B.A.T.M.A.N. (better approach to mobile ad-hoc networking) is a routing
> protocol for multi-hop ad-hoc mesh networks. The networks may be wired or
> wireless. See http://www.open-mesh.org/ for more information and user space
> tools.

It seems rather unusual to have the complete routing protocol in
kernel. And this is a lot of code. The normal way to do such things is
to have the routing policy etc. in a user daemon and only let the kernel
provide some services to this. 

Could you elaborate a bit why this approach was not chosen?

I assume if it needs a switch it could have a switching "hot path" layer
in kernel and the policy somewhere else.

You write

> +Batman advanced was implemented as a Linux kernel driver  to  re-
> +duce the overhead to a minimum. It does not depend on any (other)

What overhead exactly?

-Andi

-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html