netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: pskb_expand

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 12 Sep 2010 13:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	blp@...stanford.edu
Cc:	jarkao2@...il.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: pskb_expand_head() optimization

From: Ben Pfaff <blp@...stanford.edu>
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:55:54 -0700

> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
> 
>>> 3) since skb_clone has some cost too, why e.g. saving only the pointer
>>>    to the tail of the list in skb_shared_info isn't enough?
>>
>> Then we won't get the rest of the advantages of using list_head such
>> as prefetching during traversals, automatic debugging facilities, et al.
> 
> Did you see the recent patch from Andi Kleen where he proposes
> removing this prefetching in most situations because the costs
> outweigh the benefits on most modern architectures?
>         http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1033281
> 
> I'm not saying that list_head doesn't have other advantages
> though.

Yes I saw it and I somewhat disagree with him, but don't care
enough to argue with him about it.  There are much more important
things to apply my mind and time to at the moment :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html