netdev - RE: [PATCH NEXT 3/5] qlcnic: vlan lro support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:13:10 -0500
From:	Amit Salecha <amit.salecha@...gic.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ameen Rahman <ameen.rahman@...gic.com>,
	Anirban Chakraborty <anirban.chakraborty@...gic.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH NEXT 3/5] qlcnic: vlan lro support



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Dumazet [mailto:eric.dumazet@...il.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 6:57 PM
> To: Amit Salecha
> Cc: davem@...emloft.net; netdev@...r.kernel.org; Ameen Rahman; Anirban
> Chakraborty
> Subject: Re: [PATCH NEXT 3/5] qlcnic: vlan lro support
> 
> Le jeudi 16 septembre 2010 à 06:14 -0700, Amit Kumar Salecha a écrit :
> > LRO + GRO + vlan rx accleration support, performance increases
> > around 20% and cpu utilization reduces around 70% on vlan interface.
> 
> Interesting. What is the workload that demonstrates such gains ?
>
I ran iperf (tcp) with 8 thread without these patches and with these patches.
What kind of test community expect ?
>