netdev - Re: E1000E/82567LM-3: link reported up too soon

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:18:39 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	arno@...isbad.org
Cc:	brian.haley@...com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: E1000E/82567LM-3: link reported up too soon

From: arno@...isbad.org (Arnaud Ebalard)
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 22:09:16 +0200

> The packets sent are an IPv6 Router Solicitation (to get IPv6 subnet
> prefixes from the router) and a DHCP Request (to get an IPv4 address
> from the DHCP server). 
> 
> The former is sent from the unspecified address (::) and the latter from
> 0.0.0.0. The former is sent by UMIP Mobile IPv6 daemon. The second by my
> DHCP client. They both use netlink to do that as soon as the link is up.
> Both are for address configuration ...

So do both DHCP request and the IPV6 RS get dropped, or just the IPV6 RS?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html